( Ziiro / Docs )
[ Docs / 07 sections ]
The detail, for someone who already knows what we do: the diagnosis phase by phase, the architecture underneath, and what happens to your data.
01
02
03
Fixed in scope, seven phases. Each one shows what it does and what it leaves behind; open a phase for the frameworks and checklists it runs on.
Discovery sessions on your revenue model, customer journeys, operations, cost structure and growth blockers.
→ Business model canvas
02 frameworks
The point is to be able to describe the business without using the word AI once.
Every core process documented step by step, with manual work, bottlenecks, repeated tasks and handoffs flagged.
→ Process flowcharts
02 frameworks
Leave alone is a real answer. A step that is rare, cheap and reliable is not worth touching.
Baseline metrics before anything changes: revenue health, operational efficiency and error rates.
→ KPI baselines
03 frameworks
A standard rule of thumb: if lifetime value is under about three times acquisition cost, the problem is structural and automation will not fix it.
Taken before anything changes, because it is the only thing a later claim of improvement can be measured against.
Each problem tested against automation, prediction, summarization, classification, optimization and decision support.
→ AI opportunity list
02 frameworks
If a problem answers no to all six, it is not an AI problem. That is a useful result, not a failed one.
Monthly savings, the investment each one needs, break-even timeline and Year 1 ROI for every opportunity.
→ ROI per opportunity
01 framework
Every figure comes from the baseline taken in phase 03, not from a benchmark or an industry average. A number you cannot trace back to the client's own operation is not evidence.
Opportunities ranked by value against difficulty on a clear 2×2, so the first build is a decision, not a debate.
→ Priority matrix
02 frameworks
The matrix exists so the first build is settled by where things land rather than by who argues hardest for them.
A month-by-month plan with milestones, dependencies and success criteria for each system.
→ Implementation plan
02 frameworks
Phase 06 places every opportunity on one 2x2, so the first build is a decision rather than a debate.
04
What the Build stage puts into your stack.
Handover ends Build. Anything after it is scoped under Optimize on Pricing.
05
Anyone can call the same APIs we call. What compounds is the system built around them, and the business context that feeds it.
06
The binding versions are the Privacy Policy and the Terms. Where this page and those disagree, they win.
07
It starts with the paid consultation, billed by the hour with a one hour minimum. That hour tells us which stage you need, Diagnose, Build or Optimize, and what the stage has to cover. The price for that stage is set from there and shown before any of it starts.
That is what Optimize is: outcome tracking, tuning, and a report on an agreed cadence. It is scoped and priced as its own stage rather than bundled into an open-ended retainer.
Then that is the recommendation, and you still keep the process maps, the baselines and the ROI math. A stage that ends in evidence against building has done its job.
Whichever one suits the job. GPT, Claude and Gemini sit in one interchangeable layer of the architecture and none of them is the advantage: the system built around them and the business context feeding it are.
Only the systems the processes under review actually touch, and only from the point they are needed. What that means in practice is agreed during scoping, before any of it is connected.